There
are three levels of incompetence: stupidity,
idiocy and lunacy.
When
Cook County's 80 Democratic committeemen on Sept.
11 refused to slate incumbent Todd Stroger as the
party's candidate for Cook County Board president,
they resoundingly demonstrated their competence.
With
23,383 county jobs and a $3 billion budget loaded
with contracts which generate campaign
contributions for an array of Democratic office
holders at stake, it would have been stupid,
idiotic and utter lunacy to slate the unpopular
Stroger, whose persistent support of the sales tax
hike makes him virtually certain to lose to a
Republican in 2010.
"That
sums it up," said one Northwest Side
Democratic committeeman, who voted for no
endorsement. "He's a loser. He's toxic. He
can't win reelection. We want to keep a Democrat
in the office."
A
total of 1,091,008 ballots were cast in the 2008
Democratic primary. At slatemaking on Sept. 11,
each committeeman had a weighted vote equal to the
number of 2008 Democratic votes in his or her
Chicago ward or suburban township, so a candidate
needed 545,504 weighted votes to be slated.
Stroger was supported by 24 of 80 committeemen,
and he had barely 300,000 weighted votes.
The
other aspirants -- Alderman Toni Preckwinkle
(5th), U.S. Representative Danny Davis (D-7), Cook
County Circuit Court Clerk Dorothy Brown, who all
are black, and Metropolitan Water Reclamation
District President Terry O'Brien, who is white --
had even fewer votes than Stroger. Almost 60
percent of the committeemen voted for no
endorsement and an open primary in which each
organization can support whomever they choose.
"(The
slatemakers) always back the incumbent," said
Scott Sisek, who is managing Preckwinkle's
campaign. Rejecting Stroger, he said, was a
"huge embarrassment" to him, and it
"shows how weak he is." The last sitting
county board president to be dumped was Democrat
Seymour Simon in 1966, and the last Republican to
be elected to the post was Dick Ogilvie in 1966.
If
the primary field consists of five contenders,
whoever gets approximately 200,000 votes will win.
The filing period begins on Oct. 26. Will
Stroger's name identification and South Side black
support enable him to get 33 percent of the vote?
Will Preckwinkle's liberal, independent record and
gender appeal to white liberals and women enable
her to get 33 percent? Will O'Brien, as the sole
credible white candidate, with an unblemished
record at the water district, get over 65 percent
of the white vote?
Any
election featuring an incumbent is a referendum on
that incumbent. The latest polls show Stroger's
approval rating at around 10 percent.
Stroger
twice vetoed a repeal of the sales tax increase,
which raised $400 million, claiming it is needed
to fund "essential services." Yet
most voters, especially white voters, have no need
to utilize the county's health services (Stroger,
Provident and Oak Forest hospitals and various
health clinics), criminal justice services (County
Jail and the courts) or the forest preserves. To
them, the hike was nonessential.
Preckwinkle
pledged an "incremental repeal" of the
sales tax. Brown said she would make the county
more efficient, with "no new taxes."
Davis said it is "time for a change."
O'Brien said a tax hike was the "wrong
approach." They've all embraced the "I'm
not Todd" mantra.
Here's
a look at two relevant primaries:
2006:
The late John Stroger, Todd Stroger's father, beat
county Commissioner Forrest Claypool by
318,634-276,682, in a turnout of 595,316. Stroger
got 84.3 percent of the vote in the predominantly
black wards, 28.6 percent on the Northwest Side,
56 percent of the Hispanic vote and 61.8 percent
of the Chicago vote; he lost the suburbs with 39.3
percent of the vote. That gave him a victory
margin of 41,952 votes and a share of 53.5
percent. But for a stroke he suffered three weeks
before the primary, engendering a sympathy vote,
Stroger would have lost to Claypool.
The
elder Stroger, unlike his son, was not deemed a
fool, but the anti-Stroger vote was 46.5 percent.
In 2010 the anti-Stroger vote will be over 80
percent.
1994:
Stroger, with Daley's covert backing, faced two
credible white candidates, Circuit Court Clerk
Aurie Pucinski and county Commissioner Maria
Pappas. He got 47.1 percent of the vote, with
295,358 votes in a turnout of 626,457. He received
82.3 percent of the black vote, 26.4 percent on
the Northwest Side, 33.4 percent on the Southwest
Side, 39.5 percent on the Lakefront and 34.7
percent in the suburbs.
Due
to the efforts of pro-Daley committeemen, Stroger
won 30.8 percent of the vote in the 45th Ward,
37.9 percent in the 47th Ward, 23.7 percent in the
39th Ward, 24.6 percent in the 38th Ward, 20.9
percent in the 36th Ward and 20.6 percent in the
41st Ward. "The Toddler," unsupported by
any white committeemen, will get under less than
10 percent of the vote in those wards in 2010.
In
handicapping 2010, demographics are elemental:
Blacks comprise one-third of the countywide vote
(200,000), Hispanics less than 10 percent (60,000)
and whites the remainder (340,000). John Stroger
won in 2006 because he got 85 percent of his black
base, half the Hispanic vote and 35 percent of the
white vote. Stroger averaged 306,000 votes in his
1994 and 2006 primaries, of which about 125,000
votes were from nonblack voters.
The
key to the 2010 primary lies in two words: Mayor
Daley. In 2008, faced with a plethora of
candidates, Democratic slatemakers voted no
endorsement in the primary for Cook County state's
attorney. As usual, the mayor was circumspect and
calculating. The unions were behind Alderman Tom
Allen (38th), an occasional Daley critic, the
blacks were behind Alderman Howard Brookins
(21st), the Lakefront and suburban liberals were
behind county Commissioner Larry Suffredin, and
retiring incumbent Dick Devine endorsed his chief
deputy, Bob Milan.
But,
in a turnout of 917,737, fueled by a surge of
support for Barack Obama's presidential candidacy,
the obscure underdog, Anita Alvarez, the chief
deputy state's attorney, pulled a huge upset,
capitalizing on the fact that she was a woman, a
Hispanic and the mayor's unofficial choice. She
got just 25.8 percent of the vote, but backing
from pro-Daley organizations in the 10th, 11th,
13th and 14th wards, plus a plurality in all the
Hispanic-majority wards, put her over the top.
Will
2010 be "Alvarez, Part II"? The mayor
has several priorities:
First,
he is up for reelection in February of 2011. He
cannot precipitate an aroused black electorate,
which could occur if a black county board
president is replaced by a white president.
Second,
he wants to put somebody in the job who is under
the thumb of his brother, John Daley, who is the
county board Finance Committee chairman. If
O'Brien is the new president, he would be not only
another white face, but a potential future mayoral
contender. The mayor does not want O'Brien to win.
Third,
as was demonstrated in the Alvarez upset, the
mayor need not make a decision and deploy his
troops until January, the month before the Feb. 2
primary. And, according to party insiders, his
preferred choice is Preckwinkle. Her victory would
solve a myriad of problems: She'd be a black,
female face. She wouldn't run for mayor against
him in 2011, which she might do if she lost in
2010. She would not have a vote, as she would not
be a county commissioner. She's intelligent and
competent, and she presumably would not be
insistent on raising taxes.
Here's
an early look at the candidates' strategies,
presuming a turnout of 600,000:
Stroger:
With $640,000 in his campaign fund, Stroger will
be visible. Detested by white liberals as
incompetent and/or corrupt and by white ethnics
and conservatives as a tax hiker, Stroger's only
salvation lies in playing the "race
card," claiming that the white establishment
wants him out. Even if he corrals 75 percent of
the black vote (150,000 votes), that would give
him only 25 percent of the primary vote, not
enough to win.
Preckwinkle:
She must package herself as the "New Obama"
-- meaning the fashionable black candidate for
whom white liberals must vote, and she must get
Daley's covert support. If she gets 40 percent of
the black vote (80,000 votes) and a third of the
white (114,000) and Hispanic (20,000) vote, she
wins with 214,000 votes, just a shade over 33
percent of the total.
O'Brien:
As the water district president since 1996,
O'Brien has compiled a competent record. Although
unknown countywide, he has an Irish surname, and
he will spend lavishly. He will have nonexistent
appeal to blacks and minimal appeal to Hispanics.
That means he needs at least two-thirds of the
white vote (226,000 votes).
Davis
and Brown are spoilers for Preckwinkle. Davis will
have some West Side black support, and Brown will
have some South Side backing. They muddle the
anti-Stroger message and vote, and they give
urgency and credibility to O'Brien's claim that he
is the only real alternative to 4 more years of
"The Toddler." O'Brien is favored.