To
wax Shakespearean, Illinois House Speaker Mike
Madigan has a serious conundrum in the northwest
suburban 65th District: To fund or not to fund,
that is the question.
In
other words, does Madigan make the defeat of
veteran Republican state Representative Rosemary
Mulligan (R-65) in November a top priority? If so,
he'll have to dump $500,000 into the race, making
it a tier-one contest, and since Mulligan is
unquestionably the most vociferous advocate of
abortion rights in the Illinois House, does
Madigan really want to infuriate Personal PAC and
other pro-choice groups? If the speaker wants his
daughter, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan,
to be governor in 2010, the pro-choice vote will
be critical in a Democratic primary. So why
antagonize it?
"I'm
one of his two top targets," Mulligan said of
Madigan's quest to elect 72 Democrats in 2008,
giving him a veto-proof 72-46 majority in the
Illinois House, an important benchmark in his
battle with Democratic Governor Rod Blagojevich.
The other targeted incumbent is Brent Hassert
(R-85), of the Lockport-Romeoville-Bolingbrook
area in Will County.
But,
adds Mulligan, "my race is not about George
and George," referring to the president and
the former governor. "I'm an independent
Republican with a record of accomplishment."
The
65th District, centered in Park Ridge and Des
Plaines, is clearly trending Democratic, and 2008
portends to be a big Democratic year. George Ryan
won it with 65.5 percent of the vote in 1998 and
George Bush with 51 percent in 2000, but it went
for John Kerry with 50.1 percent in 2004. In the
2008 Democratic presidential primary, Barack Obama
barely lost to Park Ridge native Hillary Clinton
in Maine Township, which includes the district, by
10,334-9,781. For decades, the district's liberal
base has been growing.
Aurora
Austriaco, a Park Ridge attorney born in the
Philippines, is the Democratic candidate, and she,
like Obama, trumpets herself as an agent of
"change." Yet she has nary a bad word to
say about Mulligan, other than a few platitudes
about "doing a lot better," while
admitting that Blagojevich "has done a bad
job." Adds Austriaco: "I will not run a
negative campaign."
Any
contest featuring an incumbent is a referendum on
the incumbent. To beat Mulligan, Austriaco must
give voters a plausible reason to vote against
her. Both candidates were unopposed in the Feb. 5
primary, and Austriaco got 10,641 votes to
Mulligan's 5,358. Is that a harbinger for
November? "The Democrats just had a higher
turnout," Mulligan said.
Austriaco
had cash on hand of $50,264 as of Dec. 31,
compared to Mulligan's $36,786. That makes it a
tier-three contest -- meaning an easy incumbent
retention. If, however, Madigan weighs in with a
half mil, enough to print and mail a dozen pieces
to the district's 30,000 households during
September and October, he needs some negativity to
justify Mulligan's ouster. She can't be battered
for her fiscally conservative voting record. She
has no personal scandals or ethical lapses. But a
relentless "George and George" and
throw-out-all-the-Republicans strategy could work.
"I
will be an independent Democrat," insists
Austriaco, but if Madigan spends $500,000 to elect
her, she will be a "Madigan Democrat," a
faceless and inconsequential soldier in the House
Democratic majority who will vote as the speaker
dictates.
Mulligan,
of Des Plaines, age 66, achieved iconic status by
defeating anti-abortion Republican incumbent Penny
Pullen in the 1992 Republican primary. Elected in
1976, Pullen, of Park Ridge, perpetually attempted
to restrict abortion availability and AIDS
funding. Pullen was deemed Illinois' most
ineffectual legislator, and she was detested for
her obtuseness and intransigence. Mulligan beat
Pullen in the 1990 primary by 31 votes, but Pullen
filed a legal challenge, and the result was
overturned by the Illinois Supreme Court. Mulligan
thumped Pullen by 1,224 votes in the 1992 rematch,
and she easily repelled primary challenges by
anti-abortion conservatives in 1996 and 1998. Even
though she is toxic to about a third of the
Republicans in her district, Mulligan keeps
winning because she is a heroine to about a third
of the Democrats.
Mulligan,
like Pullen, is intransigent on abortion: To her,
it's a woman's choice, with no parental or spousal
exception, or for rape and incest. Mulligan
sponsored legislation to mandate emergency room
contraceptives to rape victims.
Democrats
have tried many strategies, ideological and
demographic, to beat her. Tom Cahill, a Des
Plaines attorney, ran as a pro-life Democrat; he
lost 18,982-14,539, with 43.4 percent of the vote,
in 1996 and 9,987-14,380, with 40.1 percent, in
1998.
Since
a conservative Des Plaines man couldn't beat
Mulligan, Madigan decided to change the
demographic and recruited a pro-choice Park Ridge
female attorney, Mary Beth Tighe, in 2000. Tighe
tried to be a Mulligan knock-off, or
"Mulligan Lite," and she almost
succeeded. She ran as a semi-unabashed liberal,
supportive (like Mulligan) of gun control and gay
rights but with a nuanced stance on abortion: She
opposed partial-birth abortions and backed
parental notification on minors' abortions.
Tighe
tied herself closely to Al Gore, but she still
lost to Mulligan by 17,448-16,119, with 48 percent
of the vote, a margin of just 1,329 votes. Gore
beat Bush 18,112-16,119 in the district.
Having
flopped with Tighe, Madigan in 2002 decided to
"out-lib" Mulligan, much as George
Wallace in Alabama vowed in the 1960s that he
would never be "out-segged" by any foe
on segregation. He recruited Barbara Jones, a Park
Ridge attorney who ran as a "me too"
abortion foe, spent $55,600 (to Mulligan's
$213,959), and lost 17,488-11,338, with 39.4
percent of the vote. Jones' positioning didn't
much impress the pro-choice lobby, as Personal PAC
contributed $26,009 to Mulligan.
In
2004 Mulligan crushed Democrat Mike Tashman
25,207-13,019, with 65.9 percent of the vote, and
in 2006 she ran unopposed, getting 21,568 votes.
In 2000 and 2004, both presidential election
years, district turnout was over 35,000. To win,
Austriaco needs to replicate Tighe's 2000 showing
of 16,000 votes and convert 3,000 to 4,000
Mulligan voters to her candidacy.
Mulligan
is the minority spokeswoman on the House
Appropriations-Human Services Committee, which
controls funding for all state social services.
"She is good on human services issues,"
admits Austriaco.
The
incumbent will also stress her record on women's
issues. She sponsored a bill to require obstetric
and gynecological treatment by all providers, even
if that specialty is not in the group. She also
sponsored a law to ban "drive-through"
mastectomies, allowing overnight, not same-day,
treatment. Another bill required emergency room
contraceptives for rape victims.
"I
am effective in Springfield on issues relevant to
my district," argued Mulligan. "I
provide good constituent service. I represent the
majority opinion." Mulligan has voted against
past Blagojevich budgets, against pension raids,
and against budget "sweeps."
But,
Mulligan admits, her future depends on the size of
Madigan's majority and on whether Republican House
leader Tom Cross, a close ally, runs for governor
in 2010. "We have to have enough members to
be relevant," Mulligan said, which means the
Republicans must retain at least their current 51
seats. If they lose five seats in 2008, falling to
less than 40 percent of the House membership, they
would be irrelevant. If that occurred, "I
would consider retiring," Mulligan said.
The
65th District includes all of Maine Township (64
precincts), plus small portions of Elk Grove (16
precincts), Norwood Park (nine precincts) and
Leyden (five precincts) townships; it also
includes six precincts in Chicago, in the area
west of Cumberland Avenue and south of Higgins
Avenue.
Austriaco,
age 43, advocates more funding for state education
and social services, but she flatly opposes any
increase in local property taxes or the state
income tax or any expansion of gambling.
"There is so much waste in (state)
government," she said, sounding like a
Republican. She supports a constitutional
amendment to allow the recall of state officials,
but not judges.
"She's
a three-time loser," sneered one local
Republican, noting that in 2005 Austriaco finished
last in an eight-candidate field for Maine
Township trustee and that she failed to get
appointed as a Park Ridge alderman and Park
District commissioner when she applied.
"She's a lightweight with no
credibility."
The
bottom line: To win, Austriaco needs to ostracize
Mulligan and differentiate herself her. Other than
party affiliation, they are two peas in a pod.
Austriaco contends that the influx of new, younger
and Democratic voters into the district will boost
her, as they don't know Mulligan. But Mulligan has
a core vote that, if diminishing, will still back
her -- even if she is a Republican.
My
prediction: Mulligan will win in 2008, and maybe
in 2010, if she runs. But Austriaco, if she is
persistent, unlike past losers Tighe and Jones,
will win the seat when Mulligan quits. As for
November, expect Madigan to dump minimal money
into the 65th District, resulting in a 55-45
percent Mulligan win.