As
always, this column revels in delivering good, bad
and atrocious news, especially the latter.
For
Chicagoans, particularly those on the Northwest
Side, the good news is that the city's next
mayoral and aldermanic election is roughly 730
days away and will not occur until April 5, 2011.
The
bad news is that, two years out, the 2011 campaign
is already under way, with incumbents girding for
battle and raising money and challengers getting
ready to hurl buckets of dirt.
And
the atrocious news is that voters can anticipate
24 months of sustained and nauseating political
tumult, turmoil and negativity.
All
2011 projections are contingent upon whether Mayor
Rich Daley runs for reelection. That decision may
depend on whether Chicago gets the 2016 Olympics.
If Chicago is denied, Daley might bail. If he
runs, he'll win easily, in a low turnout. If the
federal investigation into Chicago corruption
results in his indictment or if he quits,
political pandemonium will ensue, with many
mayoral aspirants and a huge turnout.
In
the 45th Ward, encompassing Jefferson Park,
Gladstone Park, Forest Glen and Portage Park,
six-term Alderman Pat Levar announced for
reelection on March 11, fully aware of his dire
predicament.
An
aldermanic contest is a referendum on the
competence and performance of the incumbent. Levar,
facing three opponents in 2007, won an
unimpressive 56.2 percent of the vote, avoiding a
runoff by 818 votes. Turnout was 13,125, about
half of the November 2008 turnout.
A
number of Levar critics are pondering a 2011
challenge, and the ultimate field will contain
seven or eight candidates. Under the Chicago
system, all candidates run in a nonpartisan
February "jungle primary." If a
candidate gets more than 50 percent of the vote
he's elected; if not, there's an April runoff
between the top two finishers. A sizable 43.8
percent of the ward's voters rejected Levar in
2007, in a low turnout. Here are the key
questions:
First,
what is Levar's "base" vote? He got
7,380 votes in 2007, fewer than Daley's 10,550 in
the ward, despite spending more than $250,000.
Levar amassed 8,667 votes in 2003, 14,199 in 1999,
10,842 in 1995 and 15,850 in 1991. Clearly,
Levar's popularity has dwindled. His vote
"ceiling," at best, is 8,000, and maybe
a lot less. That means a 2011 ward turnout of
16,000-plus would force a runoff.
Second,
can Levar repackage and resell himself? He's now
the ward Democratic committeeman, and he runs the
machinery that pulls out the
"controllable" vote. That's not helpful
in expanding his support. He has to reinvent
himself, in both style and substance, and persuade
independent voters that he is an acceptable and
accessible alderman.
Third,
how large is the ward's independent/liberal vote?
In the 2008 presidential primary, Barack Obama got
6,086 votes (46.9 percent of the total) in the
45th Ward, to 6,240 for Hillary Clinton. In the
2004 U.S. Senate primary, Obama got 3,352 votes
(35.6 percent of the total). Obama voters won't be
Levar supporters.
And
fourth, can Levar avoid a runoff? Every candidate
will be criticizing him. Each will have some
neighborhood, ethnic, gender, ideological or
political base. Each will be positioning himself
or herself so as to unify the anti-Levar vote in a
prospective runoff. If Levar has five or more
foes, a runoff is assured.
The
most apt area historical analogy is the 1991
contest in the 41st Ward, when increasingly
unpopular Roman Pucinski, an 18-year alderman,
faced seven opponents and got 9,181 votes (41.6
percent of the total) in a turnout of 22,034. In
the runoff against Brian Doherty, with a higher
turnout of 25,480 due to the mayoral election,
Pucinski upped his vote to 11,698 (45.9 percent),
an increase of 2,517, but Doherty's vote soared to
13,782, which meant that almost all the anti-Pucinski
primary vote went to him.
For
Levar, like Pucinski, a multiplicity of 2011
candidates and a runoff would be fatal. Hence,
Levar ranks atop the city's "Most Endangered
Aldermen" list.
Levar,
age 58, is likable and garrulous, but he is
perceived by many as inaccessible and indecisive.
"There is this enormous frustration of being
ignored" by Levar among community groups,
said John Arena, vice president of the Portage
Park Neighborhood Association. "He is a
control freak. He needs to make every decision. He
won't take community advice, but he won't make
timely decisions. That creates serious
problems."
Specifically,
Arena said that Levar's "indecisiveness"
has "bungled a huge opportunity" to
redevelop the Six Corners (Milwaukee/Cicero/Irving
Park) area, particularly the Klee Building. At
present, 64 residential condominiums have been
built, but the building's "commercial
package" has "been an abject
failure," Arena said. "There are few
tenants. He has not done a good job."
"That
sounds about right" concerning Levar's
aldermanic style, said Terry Boyke, Levar's top
aide who quit and ran against his former boss in
2007, getting 4,004 votes (30.5 percent of the
total). "There is a great deal of
discontent" with Levar, added Boyke, who now
works for his father's landscaping company and is
considering running in 2011.
Greg
Sedlacek, a business consultant who also is
considering a 2011 bid, is more emphatic:
"The (45th Ward) stinks to high heaven,"
Sedlacek said. "There must be change. All the
TIFs -- Lawrence-Milwaukee, Six Corners and Elston
Avenue -- have been failures." And, Sedlacek
added, Levar has been to Greece "three times
at the expense of Jim Kozonis," who owns the
vacant Lawrence Avenue property east of Milwaukee
Avenue. "That's inappropriate."
The
alderman "thinks he is royalty,"
Sedlacek said. "All his family is or was on
the public payroll." Sedlacek noted that
Levar's wife, Mary Ann, was an in-district
congressional staffer to Rod Blagojevich and Rahm
Emanuel. She could be fired after Mike Quigley is
installed. His brother Tom was a deputy streets
and sanitation commissioner, and his brother Mike
was an Aviation Department employee who oversaw
O'Hare Airport construction contracts. Both are
now retired. According to press reports, the U.S.
Attorney's Office is investigating city aviation
deals. Tom Levar's wife formerly was a Chicago
Park District superintendent at Sauganash Park,
and the alderman's son Pat Jr. is the director of
facility management at the park district.
"This nepotism has to end," Sedlacek
emphasized.
In
addition, added Sedlacek, Levar is the chairman of
the City Council Aviation Committee. "That's
where he gets his clout," meaning jobs and
contributions, Sedlacek said. "There are over
1,100 jobs at O'Hare."
A
certain 2011 candidate is Forest Glen real estate
agent Anna Klocek, who got 1,086 votes (8.2
percent of the total) in 2007 despite an
amateurish campaign. In the March 3 Democratic
congressional primary, Klocek worked hard for
Polish American Dr. Victor Forys, who got 1,380
votes in the 45th Ward in an ethnically directed
campaign. As a Polish American and a woman, Klocek
has a significant base.
Klocek
intends to run against "politics as
usual" in Chicago. "We sold the city
parking meters," she said. "We're
selling Midway airport. Our schools have been
abandoned. Our city budget is out of control, and
the TIF money is gone. I hold Levar accountable.
He is the mayor's alderman, not our alderman. To
change the city we must change the
politicians."
Also
in the mix is Bruno Bellissimo, a tax accountant
and a former city revenue department employee.
"I have a huge machine to fight," as an
aldermanic candidate, he said.
Levar,
however, is no wilting daisy. "I've done a
great job for 22 years," he asserts. At his
announcement, Levar touted "major ward
accomplishments," including a new library and
a police station, a $10 million senior citizen
resident center, a Jewel/Osco at Six Corners and a
CVS at Montrose-Milwaukee, the reopening of the
Portage Theater, $10 million in school and
playground improvements, new lighting and a
resurfacing and streetscaping of Milwaukee Avenue
from Gale Street to Montrose Avenue to during
2009.
"I
will keep working hard," Levar said.
"I'm a nuts-and-bolts alderman who just gets
the job done. But it's obvious that I need to blow
my own horn more. There is still much to do."
Levar intends to open a Web site and send out a
quarterly newsletter.
The
Klee Building "was abandoned," Levar
said. "Now we're at 50 percent
occupancy," with a Pearle Vision, a Vitamin
Shoppe and a Cricket wireless store. "All
(redevelopment) plans were presented to the
community." Regarding Lawrence Avenue, Levar
advocates the voluntary acquisition of four
parcels by the city Department of Community
Development. "We need developers," he
said. "It's a terrible, embarrassing
situation," said Boyke. "It should have
been resolved years ago."
Rebutting
Sedlacek's allegation regarding Greece, Levar said
that he's been there "a couple times"
under Chicago's "sister city" program
but that "I always paid my own way."
My
prediction: Despite 22 years in office, Lever has
not become an icon -- a beloved and unbeatable
figure. He never will be. By mid-2009 the anti-Levar
field will include Klocek, Sedlacek, Bellissimo
and Arena. More will join. Their early job is to
identify Levar with ward problems and castigate
him for their non-solution. The "magic
number" is seven: That many candidates would
guarantee a runoff.
Levar
is not quite toast yet. But he will soon be on the
menu at Quizno's.
Next
week: An analysis of other developing Northwest
Side aldermanic races.