Attorney
General Lisa Madigan is no Judy Baar Topinka. When
Madigan challenges Governor Rod Blagojevich in the
2010 Democratic primary, she won't lack money,
manpower or credibility. Blagojevich will spend
$15 million to beat her, but she will match him
dollar for dollar -- and win.
Jockeying
for 2010 permeates all that transpires in
Springfield, and the governor's "tax
fairness" proposal lays out his strategy.
Preparing for the "fight of the
century," Blagojevich seeks more tax revenue
to avoid a catastrophic state fiscal crisis in
2008 and 2009, which would doom him in 2010.
Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan, conversely,
hopes for such a crisis, to help elect his
daughter. And Illinois Senate President Emil
Jones, a Blagojevich ally, backs a tax hike but
doesn't want to jeopardize his 37-22 Democratic
majority by putting them on record if Madigan is
going to kill it in the House.
In
the last century, with the exception of Jim
Thompson, who was re-elected three times and who
served from 1977 to 1990, no Illinois governor has
won a third term. Republican Bill Stratton lost in
1960, and Republican Dwight Green lost in 1948.
The only incumbent to lose a primary was Democrat
Dan Walker in 1976.
Among
Springfield insiders, the governor's fiscal
program has been dubbed "Blagojevich
First," as his first and foremost motivation
is to keep himself in office. It would generate
$33 billion in new revenue beginning in 2008: $16
billion in new pension obligation bonds and $10
billion from leasing the Illinois Lottery, to be
allocated to pension debt, and $7 billion in
business taxes. Spending for education would rise
23 percent, by $1.5 billion in 2008 and by $10
billion over 4 years. Spending on roads and
infrastructure would rise by $1.5 billion. The
unfunded liability of state pensions, which is now
$41 billion, including a $22 billion of
underfunding for teachers, would be reduced by $27
billion. And $2.1 billion would be spent for
expanded health care coverage for 1.4 million
uninsured adults, rising to $4 billion annually in
3 years.
That
means imposing $7 billion in new taxes on Illinois
businesses, in the form of a tax of 0.5 percent on
the gross receipts exceeding $2 million of
manufacturers, retailers, wholesalers and
construction companies and a tax of 1.8 percent on
professionals, including lawyers, lobbyists,
doctors, dentists, accountants and any other
licensed individual. In addition, a 3 percent
payroll tax would be levied on any business with
more than 10 employees.
If
successful, Blagojevich can claim to have
"solved" the state's fiscal ills without
having raised either the state income tax or the
state sales tax -- which he pledged not to do. The
flood of new revenue will appease the state's
teacher lobby, which wants higher salaries and
pension protection. Plus, with billions more being
spent on state construction and health care,
Blagojevich can hit on the contractors and
providers for millions in campaign contributions.
Blagojevich
said that he wants to "ease the burden on the
middle class." But businesses exist to make a
profit, and any additional costs (or taxes) are
either passed on to the consumer in the form of
higher prices or, if impossible, passed on to the
employees in the form of layoffs or wage
reductions. According to critics, the new taxes
represent a 25 percent increase in the taxes and
fees assessed on corporations.
Madigan,
however, has his own three-pronged "Madigan
and Madigan First" strategy -- dubbed
"M&MI." First, he emerges as the
"champion" of Illinois business and
ensures that the Blagojevich proposals are dead on
arrival in the Illinois House, where he controls
the 66-52 Democratic majority with an iron fist.
Then he hits up business interests for
contributions to himself, to Democratic state
representatives, to the Illinois Democratic Party
(of which he is chairman) and to Lisa Madigan. By
taking a conservative, anti-tax, pro-business
stance, Madigan marginalizes the Republicans and
focuses all business ire on Blagojevich. After
killing the tax hike and having the governor
loudly excoriate him, Madigan will raise at least
$5 million from corporate sources.
The
fine hand of Madigan is already at work.
Democratic legislators are complaining that with
$33 billion in new revenue, there should be either
a reduction in either the property tax or the
income tax. Liberals have resurrected the concept
of a tax swap -- raising the income tax while
granting property tax reductions. With all these
proposals swirling in the wind, the General
Assembly will do what it does best: nothing.
Second,
by blocking Blagojevich's tax increases, Madigan
protects his fellow House Democrats, deprives the
Republicans of an attack issue in 2008 and keeps
his majority. To elect Lisa Madigan in 2010, Mike
Madigan must still be the speaker.
Also,
once it becomes obvious that "Blagojevich
First" won't pass the House, Jones will
refuse to call it for a vote. It's a game of
"You first." Blagojevich needs to get
his plan passed quickly by the Senate and then
have the Democratic senators pressure their House
colleagues. Madigan will postpone consideration
until June to allow business interests time to
bombard their local legislators.
And
third, by tanking "Blagojevich First,"
Madigan will prove that he's the top dog in state
government and that the governor is an ineffectual
tax hiker who can't exert leadership. The governor
will surely rip Madigan as a "tool" of
big business, to blame him for the inevitable
fiscal crisis.
State
revenues are increasing by $900 million annually
through economic growth. Spending, which was $53
billion in 2004, rose to $57 billion in 2007 and
is expected to be $60.1 billion in 2008. That
means either finding at least $2 billion in new
funding or making cutbacks by June, when fiscal
year 2008 begins. If the gross receipts tax and
the payroll tax pass, the state general revenue
fund will grow by $7 billion, avoiding a fiscal
meltdown.
In
2003 the governor closed the budget hole by
borrowing $10 billion from the pension system. As
a result, in 2008 the pension shortfall will be
$641 million, rising to $719 million in 2009 and
to $759 million in 2010.
In
prior years Blagojevich always trotted out a
stopgap fiscal gimmick. The idea was to avoid a
tax hike, push hard decisions into the future, and
get re-elected in 2006. But the future is now. In
his second term Blagojevich must prove that he is
able to solve, not just delay, problems. And the
Madigans want Blagojevich to fail. Of course, they
run a twofold risk: First, that voters will blame
Blagojevich and all Democrats for the fiscal mess
and support a Republican for governor. And second,
that the next governor would have to push through
a tax hike in 2011. But politicians never worry
about tomorrow until tomorrow. The goal is to win
the next election and focus on governing later.
Blagojevich
raised a combined $50 million in the 2002 and 2006
election cycles. He surely can raise another $20
million by 2010, but only if he looks like an
effective governor and a likely winner. His
summer-long television ad barrage last year
transformed Topinka from a credible state official
to an abject buffoon. Even so, he won by just
314,750 votes, slightly more than his 2002 margin
of 252,080 votes.
Madigan,
as the 13th Ward Democratic committeeman, is a
powerful force in Chicago politics, especially on
the Southwest Side. In 2002 he delivered 12,043
primary votes for his daughter in his ward, to
just 6,821 for Blagojevich for governor. On the
Southwest Side, Lisa Madigan would beat
Blagojevich by 2-1 in a primary. On the Northwest
Side, where the governor is still feuding with his
father-in-law, Alderman Dick Mell, and where there
is no state patronage, the Democratic committeemen
would gleefully back Madigan.
As
attorney general, Madigan has compiled a
competent, consumerist record. A
Blagojevich-Madigan primary would be a referendum
on the incumbent. To win, Blagojevich would have
to run as a "reformer," taint Madigan
with the alleged sins of her father, and go
negative on her, unearthing some personal or
professional flaw. If he does, he will enrage the
speaker, prompting him to raise and spend even
more money and to call in more markers. Also,
Blagojevich is enormously unpopular Downstate, and
Madigan will make sure his Downstate House members
get plenty of money to deliver their districts for
his daughter.
Back
in 1976, Mayor Richard J. Daley ordered Mike
Howlett, then the popular secretary of state, to
challenge Walker. Howlett won the primary
811,721-696,380, but the party was split, and
Republican Thompson won the election by 1,390,137
votes. In 2010 Blagojevich and Madigan could so
demonize each other as to render both unelectable.
But
remember this: There are nine separate
investigations into state hiring and contracts. If
there's a spate of indictments and convictions
before 2010, Blagojevich may be unelectable . . .
or may not even be governor.